<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: On why (some) humans have lost their body hair? Why are we the only hairless primate?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://anthropology.net/2007/06/08/on-why-some-humans-have-lost-their-body-hair-why-are-we-the-only-hairless-primate/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://anthropology.net/2007/06/08/on-why-some-humans-have-lost-their-body-hair-why-are-we-the-only-hairless-primate/</link>
	<description>Beyond bones &#38; stones</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 27 May 2012 06:29:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eleanor Kaywork</title>
		<link>http://anthropology.net/2007/06/08/on-why-some-humans-have-lost-their-body-hair-why-are-we-the-only-hairless-primate/#comment-33131</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Eleanor Kaywork]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2012 21:21:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://anthropology.net/2007/06/08/on-why-some-humans-have-lost-their-body-hair-why-are-we-the-only-hairless-primate/#comment-33131</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Youre all speaking of walruses and other fish. Does hairlesness have to do with human hormones, or deseases [spelling] attributed to hairlessness in humans. Nat.Indians lived in very hot and very cold climates,some swam and some didn`t ,some walked in tall grasses and some didn`t.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Youre all speaking of walruses and other fish. Does hairlesness have to do with human hormones, or deseases [spelling] attributed to hairlessness in humans. Nat.Indians lived in very hot and very cold climates,some swam and some didn`t ,some walked in tall grasses and some didn`t.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carol Lois Haywood, pacific marine artist</title>
		<link>http://anthropology.net/2007/06/08/on-why-some-humans-have-lost-their-body-hair-why-are-we-the-only-hairless-primate/#comment-32734</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Carol Lois Haywood, pacific marine artist]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2012 18:12:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://anthropology.net/2007/06/08/on-why-some-humans-have-lost-their-body-hair-why-are-we-the-only-hairless-primate/#comment-32734</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I suspect that the relative lack of hair will be found innately linked with some other genetic factor with true adaptive value. Especially since we can offer so many contradictory reasons why lack of hair or fur might have been adaptive for humans as above. That suggests it is not relevant to evolutionary success.That different groups of humans vary in the amount of hair that is typical and even between young/old and male/female supports this idea.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I suspect that the relative lack of hair will be found innately linked with some other genetic factor with true adaptive value. Especially since we can offer so many contradictory reasons why lack of hair or fur might have been adaptive for humans as above. That suggests it is not relevant to evolutionary success.That different groups of humans vary in the amount of hair that is typical and even between young/old and male/female supports this idea.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Judy Zifka</title>
		<link>http://anthropology.net/2007/06/08/on-why-some-humans-have-lost-their-body-hair-why-are-we-the-only-hairless-primate/#comment-31687</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Judy Zifka]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Mar 2012 22:07:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://anthropology.net/2007/06/08/on-why-some-humans-have-lost-their-body-hair-why-are-we-the-only-hairless-primate/#comment-31687</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I know this thread hasn&#039;t been very active lately, but I had to put in my two cents about the evolution of hair, because I think I&#039;ve finally got it figured out.  Hair is ultimately an extension of our nervous system, and each hair has one or more nerves attached to it.  There is a huge allocation of nervous system resources dedicated to hair.

Hair is therefore intimately connected with the nervous system and to the brain.   Understand that while hair is an appendage of the skin, its ultimate purpose is as an agent of the nervous system whose function is to gather sensory information.  It is a way of extending our awareness beyond the confines of our body.  The same is true for animals.  Hair is what tells their brains what is going on around them.  It also helps keep them warm, makes them pretty, and a bunch of other stuff.  But that is just icing on the cake.  The primary purpose of hair is as a sensory organ.

So why did evolution favor humans losing their body hair?  As humans were evolving and getting bigger brains, the increased resources that were needed to develop more brain neurons had to come from somewhere.  The resources came from hair.  It was the only part of the body that had extensive resources to draw from.

Every step of evolutionary advancement that our brain made has been accompanied by a loss of body hair.  The more we dedicate our neurological resources to the brain, the less we have to dedicate to body hair.  The smarter we get, the less body hair we have.

Some types of body hair have not gone away, and it is because they provide some sort of survival advantage.  Pubic hair, for example, was not only retained throughout evolution, it actually increased.  While the nervous system was taking energy away from body hair and feeding it to the brain, it was adding new resources to pubic hair.  You think monkeys have hairy genitals like we do?  Nope.  

The reason?  Once we started walking upright our potential mates couldn&#039;t just come walking up to us and sniff our crotch, like a monkey can do.  We had to find a way to trap our pheromone odor in a way that would make it available to those around us while we stood upright.  Since pheromones are so important in sexual selection, evolution favored the retention of hair in our smelly zones.  Consequently, humans have developed a hair pattern that is quite the opposite of the other mammals -- we have relatively hairless bodies and hairy genitals.

Hair has many purposes, but its role as an agent of the nervous system has been largely overlooked.  And its inverse relationship to intelligence is something that is quite thought provoking.  Among other mammals, there are just a few that don&#039;t have body hair.  We assume that whales and dolphins don&#039;t have hair because they are aquatic.  But what if they don&#039;t have hair because they are so smart?  Maybe their nervous system has been directing energy away from hair and towards the brain just like ours?

Among land mammals, there are just a few that are considered to be nearly hairless.  Elephants, hippos, and pigs are examples.  Guess what?  They are also all considered to be very intelligent.  

And have you ever heard a description of an extraterrestrial visitor, who surely must be very smart to find his way to Earth, having hair?  Nope.  ETs are always hairless.  That&#039;s because having lots of hair and having lots of brains are kind of incompatible.  From an evolutionary perspective, it makes a lot more sense to dedicate neurological energy to expanding the brain instead of using it for hair.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know this thread hasn&#8217;t been very active lately, but I had to put in my two cents about the evolution of hair, because I think I&#8217;ve finally got it figured out.  Hair is ultimately an extension of our nervous system, and each hair has one or more nerves attached to it.  There is a huge allocation of nervous system resources dedicated to hair.</p>
<p>Hair is therefore intimately connected with the nervous system and to the brain.   Understand that while hair is an appendage of the skin, its ultimate purpose is as an agent of the nervous system whose function is to gather sensory information.  It is a way of extending our awareness beyond the confines of our body.  The same is true for animals.  Hair is what tells their brains what is going on around them.  It also helps keep them warm, makes them pretty, and a bunch of other stuff.  But that is just icing on the cake.  The primary purpose of hair is as a sensory organ.</p>
<p>So why did evolution favor humans losing their body hair?  As humans were evolving and getting bigger brains, the increased resources that were needed to develop more brain neurons had to come from somewhere.  The resources came from hair.  It was the only part of the body that had extensive resources to draw from.</p>
<p>Every step of evolutionary advancement that our brain made has been accompanied by a loss of body hair.  The more we dedicate our neurological resources to the brain, the less we have to dedicate to body hair.  The smarter we get, the less body hair we have.</p>
<p>Some types of body hair have not gone away, and it is because they provide some sort of survival advantage.  Pubic hair, for example, was not only retained throughout evolution, it actually increased.  While the nervous system was taking energy away from body hair and feeding it to the brain, it was adding new resources to pubic hair.  You think monkeys have hairy genitals like we do?  Nope.  </p>
<p>The reason?  Once we started walking upright our potential mates couldn&#8217;t just come walking up to us and sniff our crotch, like a monkey can do.  We had to find a way to trap our pheromone odor in a way that would make it available to those around us while we stood upright.  Since pheromones are so important in sexual selection, evolution favored the retention of hair in our smelly zones.  Consequently, humans have developed a hair pattern that is quite the opposite of the other mammals &#8212; we have relatively hairless bodies and hairy genitals.</p>
<p>Hair has many purposes, but its role as an agent of the nervous system has been largely overlooked.  And its inverse relationship to intelligence is something that is quite thought provoking.  Among other mammals, there are just a few that don&#8217;t have body hair.  We assume that whales and dolphins don&#8217;t have hair because they are aquatic.  But what if they don&#8217;t have hair because they are so smart?  Maybe their nervous system has been directing energy away from hair and towards the brain just like ours?</p>
<p>Among land mammals, there are just a few that are considered to be nearly hairless.  Elephants, hippos, and pigs are examples.  Guess what?  They are also all considered to be very intelligent.  </p>
<p>And have you ever heard a description of an extraterrestrial visitor, who surely must be very smart to find his way to Earth, having hair?  Nope.  ETs are always hairless.  That&#8217;s because having lots of hair and having lots of brains are kind of incompatible.  From an evolutionary perspective, it makes a lot more sense to dedicate neurological energy to expanding the brain instead of using it for hair.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Tummon</title>
		<link>http://anthropology.net/2007/06/08/on-why-some-humans-have-lost-their-body-hair-why-are-we-the-only-hairless-primate/#comment-29849</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mike Tummon]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Dec 2011 05:17:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://anthropology.net/2007/06/08/on-why-some-humans-have-lost-their-body-hair-why-are-we-the-only-hairless-primate/#comment-29849</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Precicely my thoughts BUT   why women selecting men.  In primative times men selected their female partner sometimes without consent.   I see a preference of less hairy females as being wifes to fight over. And as the generations progressed the outcome was substancial less hair.   Pubic hair in a lot of tribal cultures was a signal of breeding age. so it remained in  the both sexes    
    The presence of more hair in mainly european s is largely climatic.   Males having full thick beards and sometimes lots of body hair.   obviously the females of european stock inherit more body hair because of this.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Precicely my thoughts BUT   why women selecting men.  In primative times men selected their female partner sometimes without consent.   I see a preference of less hairy females as being wifes to fight over. And as the generations progressed the outcome was substancial less hair.   Pubic hair in a lot of tribal cultures was a signal of breeding age. so it remained in  the both sexes<br />
    The presence of more hair in mainly european s is largely climatic.   Males having full thick beards and sometimes lots of body hair.   obviously the females of european stock inherit more body hair because of this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gunner Star</title>
		<link>http://anthropology.net/2007/06/08/on-why-some-humans-have-lost-their-body-hair-why-are-we-the-only-hairless-primate/#comment-28842</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gunner Star]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Nov 2011 23:52:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://anthropology.net/2007/06/08/on-why-some-humans-have-lost-their-body-hair-why-are-we-the-only-hairless-primate/#comment-28842</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[But there is one issue that none of the theories in the above article addresses, namely the wide range of body hair volume that exists among humans today, even among males with similar androgen levels. 
Unlike the hair on a human head or even the face, body hair behaves exactly like fur. It grows to a certain length and stops, and follicles shed hair and are replaced at regular intervals. I would surmise that people who today who still have this body &quot;fur&quot;, carry an active form of the genes from our ancestors prior when human body hair was lost (very roughly around 1.2 million years ago according to &quot;Before the Dawn&quot; by Nicholas Wade. I am sure regional heritage is a factor. I am of Italian decent and have &quot;fur&quot; on nearly every inch of my body. I would say this trait is mostly found among Mediterranean men, but I also have a Russian friend almost as hairy except his fur is light in color.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But there is one issue that none of the theories in the above article addresses, namely the wide range of body hair volume that exists among humans today, even among males with similar androgen levels.<br />
Unlike the hair on a human head or even the face, body hair behaves exactly like fur. It grows to a certain length and stops, and follicles shed hair and are replaced at regular intervals. I would surmise that people who today who still have this body &#8220;fur&#8221;, carry an active form of the genes from our ancestors prior when human body hair was lost (very roughly around 1.2 million years ago according to &#8220;Before the Dawn&#8221; by Nicholas Wade. I am sure regional heritage is a factor. I am of Italian decent and have &#8220;fur&#8221; on nearly every inch of my body. I would say this trait is mostly found among Mediterranean men, but I also have a Russian friend almost as hairy except his fur is light in color.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alessandro</title>
		<link>http://anthropology.net/2007/06/08/on-why-some-humans-have-lost-their-body-hair-why-are-we-the-only-hairless-primate/#comment-28212</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Alessandro]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Oct 2011 22:03:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://anthropology.net/2007/06/08/on-why-some-humans-have-lost-their-body-hair-why-are-we-the-only-hairless-primate/#comment-28212</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The aquatic theory.... you see that aquatic mammals have more fat and, having humans more underskin fat than other mammals, you think we had an aquatic time in our evolution.
I think we swap cause and effect: water itself doesn&#039;t cause fat growth. The heat transmission in water, the heat you lose, cause you to grow underskin fat.
The lowering of body temperature causes, through selection, a favour for underskin fat.
Now we have hominins without fur; hominins that suffer the cold temperature during the night. They use fire but who camped knows that fire is not always so effective.
So...what is the second choice of a mammal to protect is body against cold temperature after he has lost is fur? underskin fat, also in air environment. It is not water, it is temperature loss that causes underskin fat, don&#039;t you think so?
Do human groups living in artic regions since thousands of years have a higher average level of underkin fat in comparison with tropical humans? This could be a good indication.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The aquatic theory&#8230;. you see that aquatic mammals have more fat and, having humans more underskin fat than other mammals, you think we had an aquatic time in our evolution.<br />
I think we swap cause and effect: water itself doesn&#8217;t cause fat growth. The heat transmission in water, the heat you lose, cause you to grow underskin fat.<br />
The lowering of body temperature causes, through selection, a favour for underskin fat.<br />
Now we have hominins without fur; hominins that suffer the cold temperature during the night. They use fire but who camped knows that fire is not always so effective.<br />
So&#8230;what is the second choice of a mammal to protect is body against cold temperature after he has lost is fur? underskin fat, also in air environment. It is not water, it is temperature loss that causes underskin fat, don&#8217;t you think so?<br />
Do human groups living in artic regions since thousands of years have a higher average level of underkin fat in comparison with tropical humans? This could be a good indication.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sayang</title>
		<link>http://anthropology.net/2007/06/08/on-why-some-humans-have-lost-their-body-hair-why-are-we-the-only-hairless-primate/#comment-28162</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[sayang]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Oct 2011 19:24:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://anthropology.net/2007/06/08/on-why-some-humans-have-lost-their-body-hair-why-are-we-the-only-hairless-primate/#comment-28162</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Monkeys have both an under-fur layer and outer &quot;guard hair&quot; fur layer, this is the basic ancestral trait for all mammals (fur + milk nursing = mammal).

Great Apes have lost the inner fur layer due to tree-top nesting in tropical rainforests, where thermal insulation was less significant, but biting insects weren&#039;t (so some apes have thick fur on their more-exposed back but less on their chests (they sleep curled in a ball in the bowl-nest)).

Humans, on the other hand, split from the apes 5,000,000 years ago, with the chromosome #2 translocation, which in my opinion induced altered behavior, by producing a hominin species which spent more time at waterside foraging &amp; bathing and sleeping in inverted bowl-nests on the ground, aka geodesic dome-like huts, waterproof and insect-proof. Thus no selection for fur coat.

DDeden]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Monkeys have both an under-fur layer and outer &#8220;guard hair&#8221; fur layer, this is the basic ancestral trait for all mammals (fur + milk nursing = mammal).</p>
<p>Great Apes have lost the inner fur layer due to tree-top nesting in tropical rainforests, where thermal insulation was less significant, but biting insects weren&#8217;t (so some apes have thick fur on their more-exposed back but less on their chests (they sleep curled in a ball in the bowl-nest)).</p>
<p>Humans, on the other hand, split from the apes 5,000,000 years ago, with the chromosome #2 translocation, which in my opinion induced altered behavior, by producing a hominin species which spent more time at waterside foraging &amp; bathing and sleeping in inverted bowl-nests on the ground, aka geodesic dome-like huts, waterproof and insect-proof. Thus no selection for fur coat.</p>
<p>DDeden</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cathleen</title>
		<link>http://anthropology.net/2007/06/08/on-why-some-humans-have-lost-their-body-hair-why-are-we-the-only-hairless-primate/#comment-28042</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Cathleen]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Oct 2011 02:36:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://anthropology.net/2007/06/08/on-why-some-humans-have-lost-their-body-hair-why-are-we-the-only-hairless-primate/#comment-28042</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[But weren&#039;t the dudes the hunters? Shouldn&#039;t, by that theory, women have more hairiness, not less, then men? So far, I have to think it has to do with being in water.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But weren&#8217;t the dudes the hunters? Shouldn&#8217;t, by that theory, women have more hairiness, not less, then men? So far, I have to think it has to do with being in water.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cathleen</title>
		<link>http://anthropology.net/2007/06/08/on-why-some-humans-have-lost-their-body-hair-why-are-we-the-only-hairless-primate/#comment-28040</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Cathleen]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Oct 2011 02:31:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://anthropology.net/2007/06/08/on-why-some-humans-have-lost-their-body-hair-why-are-we-the-only-hairless-primate/#comment-28040</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I would think if it evolved because men needed it then women would need it too. No?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would think if it evolved because men needed it then women would need it too. No?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: steve</title>
		<link>http://anthropology.net/2007/06/08/on-why-some-humans-have-lost-their-body-hair-why-are-we-the-only-hairless-primate/#comment-27130</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[steve]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Sep 2011 22:06:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://anthropology.net/2007/06/08/on-why-some-humans-have-lost-their-body-hair-why-are-we-the-only-hairless-primate/#comment-27130</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There are probably a multitude of evolutionary reasons why we grew to have less hair.

I&#039;d imagine that the primary reason was that we became able to insulate ourselves and thus its evolutionary importance was lost.

Assume men are hairier due to spending longer periods working/hunting outdoors, than women so some residual benefit still remained
.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are probably a multitude of evolutionary reasons why we grew to have less hair.</p>
<p>I&#8217;d imagine that the primary reason was that we became able to insulate ourselves and thus its evolutionary importance was lost.</p>
<p>Assume men are hairier due to spending longer periods working/hunting outdoors, than women so some residual benefit still remained<br />
.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

