<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: More On Discovery Of The Oldest Adornments In The World</title>
	<atom:link href="http://anthropology.net/2007/06/18/more-on-discovery-of-the-oldest-adornments-in-the-world/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://anthropology.net/2007/06/18/more-on-discovery-of-the-oldest-adornments-in-the-world/</link>
	<description>Beyond bones &#38; stones</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 20:33:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: onyx</title>
		<link>http://anthropology.net/2007/06/18/more-on-discovery-of-the-oldest-adornments-in-the-world/#comment-15192</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[onyx]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 03:45:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://anthropology.net/2007/06/18/more-on-discovery-of-the-oldest-adornments-in-the-world/#comment-15192</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[yes. now i don&#039;t at all doubt that a sense of beauty is older then that, but i have a question, what does the red ochre do in this story? i cant imagine someone would colour shell beads with sth (red ochre) that is essentially dust on a dry surface. it would not stick for long certainly not in wear. so there must be another explanation. the instances of red ochre use i know of all have a do with burials and other symbolic arangements,(body) paints eg. so either i think the beads were initially part of a burial, or they ended up recently coloured where they did. and in some cases red ochre itself has been found solely or in combination suggesting an offering. since i don&#039;t know anything more about the circumstances of the find,  the one thing i do assume is they come from a relatively heavily disturbed context,(because the circumstance would otherways have been enthusiastically described) and much of the question that rises is , how and when was it thus disturbed.

btw i enjoy your blog and the links it provides to no end. it is pretty much the best thing that happened to me on inet since aljazeera started.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yes. now i don&#8217;t at all doubt that a sense of beauty is older then that, but i have a question, what does the red ochre do in this story? i cant imagine someone would colour shell beads with sth (red ochre) that is essentially dust on a dry surface. it would not stick for long certainly not in wear. so there must be another explanation. the instances of red ochre use i know of all have a do with burials and other symbolic arangements,(body) paints eg. so either i think the beads were initially part of a burial, or they ended up recently coloured where they did. and in some cases red ochre itself has been found solely or in combination suggesting an offering. since i don&#8217;t know anything more about the circumstances of the find,  the one thing i do assume is they come from a relatively heavily disturbed context,(because the circumstance would otherways have been enthusiastically described) and much of the question that rises is , how and when was it thus disturbed.</p>
<p>btw i enjoy your blog and the links it provides to no end. it is pretty much the best thing that happened to me on inet since aljazeera started.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

