<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Evolution of Lordosis and Pregnancy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://anthropology.net/2007/12/13/evolution-of-lordosis-and-pregnancy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://anthropology.net/2007/12/13/evolution-of-lordosis-and-pregnancy/</link>
	<description>Beyond bones &#38; stones</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 23:33:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Warren Dew</title>
		<link>http://anthropology.net/2007/12/13/evolution-of-lordosis-and-pregnancy/#comment-14007</link>
		<dc:creator>Warren Dew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 May 2009 02:19:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://anthropology.net/2007/12/13/evolution-of-lordosis-and-pregnancy/#comment-14007</guid>
		<description>It sounds to me like the other studies didn&#039;t actually &#039;show no difference&#039; between the sexes; rather, they just failed to show a difference.  For example, they could have shown that there was a difference at the 94% confidence level, which would have been &quot;no statistical difference&quot; because it&#039;s generally required to have a 95% confidence to show a statistical difference.

That suggests that there is a difference, but it&#039;s small enough that it doesn&#039;t show up statistically unless you get a big enough sample.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It sounds to me like the other studies didn&#8217;t actually &#8217;show no difference&#8217; between the sexes; rather, they just failed to show a difference.  For example, they could have shown that there was a difference at the 94% confidence level, which would have been &#8220;no statistical difference&#8221; because it&#8217;s generally required to have a 95% confidence to show a statistical difference.</p>
<p>That suggests that there is a difference, but it&#8217;s small enough that it doesn&#8217;t show up statistically unless you get a big enough sample.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Redefining the word “Human” – Do Some Apes Have Human Ancestors? : OUPblog</title>
		<link>http://anthropology.net/2007/12/13/evolution-of-lordosis-and-pregnancy/#comment-8293</link>
		<dc:creator>Redefining the word “Human” – Do Some Apes Have Human Ancestors? : OUPblog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Dec 2007 13:50:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://anthropology.net/2007/12/13/evolution-of-lordosis-and-pregnancy/#comment-8293</guid>
		<description>[...] human problem with our modern species (see Evolutionary Origins of Back Pain, and also Lumbar Lordosis in Pregnancy). Understanding a human as a type of animal with our body plan (bauplan) is what underlies this [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] human problem with our modern species (see Evolutionary Origins of Back Pain, and also Lumbar Lordosis in Pregnancy). Understanding a human as a type of animal with our body plan (bauplan) is what underlies this [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: First Final down, fall 2007 &#171; blueollie</title>
		<link>http://anthropology.net/2007/12/13/evolution-of-lordosis-and-pregnancy/#comment-7678</link>
		<dc:creator>First Final down, fall 2007 &#171; blueollie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2007 19:19:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://anthropology.net/2007/12/13/evolution-of-lordosis-and-pregnancy/#comment-7678</guid>
		<description>[...] seeing that cute woman in spandex reminded me of this article, which talks about how the human spine evolved and lordosis (the tendency for the back to arch and the butt to sway backwards) The report published in Nature [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] seeing that cute woman in spandex reminded me of this article, which talks about how the human spine evolved and lordosis (the tendency for the back to arch and the butt to sway backwards) The report published in Nature [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: archaeozoo</title>
		<link>http://anthropology.net/2007/12/13/evolution-of-lordosis-and-pregnancy/#comment-7656</link>
		<dc:creator>archaeozoo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2007 11:20:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://anthropology.net/2007/12/13/evolution-of-lordosis-and-pregnancy/#comment-7656</guid>
		<description>Very interesting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very interesting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
