<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Demographic Breakdown of Anthropology.net Readers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://anthropology.net/2008/06/01/a-demographic-breakdown-of-anthropologynet-readers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://anthropology.net/2008/06/01/a-demographic-breakdown-of-anthropologynet-readers/</link>
	<description>Beyond bones &#38; stones</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 20:33:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Repack Rider</title>
		<link>http://anthropology.net/2008/06/01/a-demographic-breakdown-of-anthropologynet-readers/#comment-11219</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Repack Rider]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jun 2008 05:19:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://anthropologynet.wordpress.com/?p=886#comment-11219</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sorry I didn&#039;t see it in time.  I could have seriously skewed the results.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry I didn&#8217;t see it in time.  I could have seriously skewed the results.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kambiz</title>
		<link>http://anthropology.net/2008/06/01/a-demographic-breakdown-of-anthropologynet-readers/#comment-11218</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kambiz]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jun 2008 04:44:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://anthropologynet.wordpress.com/?p=886#comment-11218</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yes Erella,

The original survey, I asked people to identify their biological sex and the gender they associate with. 100% of males identified with being men, and 100% of females identified with being women. Because of this, I decided to clump them both together.

Kambiz]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes Erella,</p>
<p>The original survey, I asked people to identify their biological sex and the gender they associate with. 100% of males identified with being men, and 100% of females identified with being women. Because of this, I decided to clump them both together.</p>
<p>Kambiz</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Erella</title>
		<link>http://anthropology.net/2008/06/01/a-demographic-breakdown-of-anthropologynet-readers/#comment-11217</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Erella]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jun 2008 04:41:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://anthropologynet.wordpress.com/?p=886#comment-11217</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[sex AND gender???]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>sex AND gender???</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Laura Jefferson</title>
		<link>http://anthropology.net/2008/06/01/a-demographic-breakdown-of-anthropologynet-readers/#comment-11203</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Laura Jefferson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jun 2008 11:45:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://anthropologynet.wordpress.com/?p=886#comment-11203</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I missed the poll, but I am female, 51, and have an MDiv. and a deep affection for archaeology.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I missed the poll, but I am female, 51, and have an MDiv. and a deep affection for archaeology.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jade</title>
		<link>http://anthropology.net/2008/06/01/a-demographic-breakdown-of-anthropologynet-readers/#comment-11196</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jade]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jun 2008 02:28:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://anthropologynet.wordpress.com/?p=886#comment-11196</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It is possible that the data is not truly representative of the sex of your readers due to the possibility that a higher percentage of males could have responded to the survey.  It would be interesting to see if someone has done a study on the likelihood of males versus females to respond to online surveys.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is possible that the data is not truly representative of the sex of your readers due to the possibility that a higher percentage of males could have responded to the survey.  It would be interesting to see if someone has done a study on the likelihood of males versus females to respond to online surveys.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: razib</title>
		<link>http://anthropology.net/2008/06/01/a-demographic-breakdown-of-anthropologynet-readers/#comment-11187</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[razib]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Jun 2008 21:35:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://anthropologynet.wordpress.com/?p=886#comment-11187</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[i think the sex imbalance is statistically significant. FWIW, GNXP has about a 85:15 male female ratio, stable over 5 years of surveys (usually get 300-500 responses).]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i think the sex imbalance is statistically significant. FWIW, GNXP has about a 85:15 male female ratio, stable over 5 years of surveys (usually get 300-500 responses).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

