<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Peopling Of The Americas: Eva de Naharon, A 13,600 Year Old Skeleton Found Near Tulum, Mexico</title>
	<atom:link href="http://anthropology.net/2008/09/04/peopling-of-the-americas-eva-de-naharon-a-13600-year-old-skeleton-found-near-tulum-mexico/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://anthropology.net/2008/09/04/peopling-of-the-americas-eva-de-naharon-a-13600-year-old-skeleton-found-near-tulum-mexico/</link>
	<description>Beyond bones &#38; stones</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 May 2012 15:52:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: david</title>
		<link>http://anthropology.net/2008/09/04/peopling-of-the-americas-eva-de-naharon-a-13600-year-old-skeleton-found-near-tulum-mexico/#comment-17068</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[david]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Apr 2010 02:52:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://anthropologynet.wordpress.com/?p=1348#comment-17068</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[you see how they felt it was imperative to have a white person with the remains..if it were up to me id kick out every single europeans from Mexicos ancient sites...i also find it funny they keep pushing the &quot;peopling&quot; theory further and further back each time older remains are found...white people are sick]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>you see how they felt it was imperative to have a white person with the remains..if it were up to me id kick out every single europeans from Mexicos ancient sites&#8230;i also find it funny they keep pushing the &#8220;peopling&#8221; theory further and further back each time older remains are found&#8230;white people are sick</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Welch</title>
		<link>http://anthropology.net/2008/09/04/peopling-of-the-americas-eva-de-naharon-a-13600-year-old-skeleton-found-near-tulum-mexico/#comment-14790</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Richard Welch]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 02:49:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://anthropologynet.wordpress.com/?p=1348#comment-14790</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is just one more indicator that the earliest Americans were not from Asia but from Europe, arriving via a North Atlantic archipelago (India is basically Caucasian). See my Roots of Cataclysm, Algora Publ.Ny 2009)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is just one more indicator that the earliest Americans were not from Asia but from Europe, arriving via a North Atlantic archipelago (India is basically Caucasian). See my Roots of Cataclysm, Algora Publ.Ny 2009)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Luis</title>
		<link>http://anthropology.net/2008/09/04/peopling-of-the-americas-eva-de-naharon-a-13600-year-old-skeleton-found-near-tulum-mexico/#comment-12393</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Luis]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2008 12:33:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://anthropologynet.wordpress.com/?p=1348#comment-12393</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What do you think they mean by &quot;South Asian affinities&quot;? My first thought was to ponder if means &quot;South Asian&quot; as in Indian or as in Indochinan (SE Asian). The main reason for this doubt is that the phrase is made in contrast to &quot;North Asian&quot;, what obviously means NE Asian. 

So I don&#039;t know if they mean some sort of Australoid or pseudo-Australoid typology or more like Austronesian, or even something totally different. 

In any case, it seems clear now that the dates for the colonization of America are getting consistently older (but within reasonable figures).]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What do you think they mean by &#8220;South Asian affinities&#8221;? My first thought was to ponder if means &#8220;South Asian&#8221; as in Indian or as in Indochinan (SE Asian). The main reason for this doubt is that the phrase is made in contrast to &#8220;North Asian&#8221;, what obviously means NE Asian. </p>
<p>So I don&#8217;t know if they mean some sort of Australoid or pseudo-Australoid typology or more like Austronesian, or even something totally different. </p>
<p>In any case, it seems clear now that the dates for the colonization of America are getting consistently older (but within reasonable figures).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

