<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Race As A Social Construct</title>
	<atom:link href="http://anthropology.net/2008/10/01/race-as-a-social-construct/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://anthropology.net/2008/10/01/race-as-a-social-construct/</link>
	<description>Beyond bones &#38; stones</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 20:33:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Krantzstone</title>
		<link>http://anthropology.net/2008/10/01/race-as-a-social-construct/#comment-28785</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Krantzstone]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Nov 2011 11:34:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://anthropologynet.wordpress.com/?p=1396#comment-28785</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think what the author is referring to is where the racial lines are drawn is entirely arbitrary, and entirely based on whether someone passes (in terms of superficial outward features) for a certain &#039;race&#039; or not.  As for any biological basis:

&quot;In the United States both scholars and the general public have been conditioned to viewing human races as natural and separate divisions within the human species based on visible physical differences. With the vast expansion of scientific knowledge in this century, however, it has become clear that human populations are not unambiguous, clearly demarcated, biologically distinct groups. Evidence from the analysis of genetics (e.g., DNA) indicates that most physical variation, about 94%, lies within so-called racial groups. Conventional geographic &quot;racial&quot; groupings differ from one another only in about 6% of their genes. This means that there is greater variation within &quot;racial&quot; groups than between them. In neighboring populations there is much overlapping of genes and their phenotypic (physical) expressions. Throughout history whenever different groups have come into contact, they have interbred. The continued sharing of genetic materials has maintained all of humankind as a single species.&quot;

- from &#039;Statement on &#039;Race&#039; (1998) by the American Anthropological Association  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Race_(classification_of_humans)#U.S._anthropology]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think what the author is referring to is where the racial lines are drawn is entirely arbitrary, and entirely based on whether someone passes (in terms of superficial outward features) for a certain &#8216;race&#8217; or not.  As for any biological basis:</p>
<p>&#8220;In the United States both scholars and the general public have been conditioned to viewing human races as natural and separate divisions within the human species based on visible physical differences. With the vast expansion of scientific knowledge in this century, however, it has become clear that human populations are not unambiguous, clearly demarcated, biologically distinct groups. Evidence from the analysis of genetics (e.g., DNA) indicates that most physical variation, about 94%, lies within so-called racial groups. Conventional geographic &#8220;racial&#8221; groupings differ from one another only in about 6% of their genes. This means that there is greater variation within &#8220;racial&#8221; groups than between them. In neighboring populations there is much overlapping of genes and their phenotypic (physical) expressions. Throughout history whenever different groups have come into contact, they have interbred. The continued sharing of genetic materials has maintained all of humankind as a single species.&#8221;</p>
<p>- from &#8216;Statement on &#8216;Race&#8217; (1998) by the American Anthropological Association  <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Race_(classification_of_humans)#U.S._anthropology" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Race_(classification_of_humans)#U.S._anthropology</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Krantzstone</title>
		<link>http://anthropology.net/2008/10/01/race-as-a-social-construct/#comment-28783</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Krantzstone]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Nov 2011 10:42:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://anthropologynet.wordpress.com/?p=1396#comment-28783</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Have you considered the possibility that you might simply be racist?

/or a troll
//or both]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Have you considered the possibility that you might simply be racist?</p>
<p>/or a troll<br />
//or both</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Science of Race: Is it Genetic or a Social Construct? &#124; Persephone Magazine</title>
		<link>http://anthropology.net/2008/10/01/race-as-a-social-construct/#comment-28745</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[The Science of Race: Is it Genetic or a Social Construct? &#124; Persephone Magazine]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Nov 2011 20:27:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://anthropologynet.wordpress.com/?p=1396#comment-28745</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] very much.Short answer: No, there is no genetic basis for race that negates the social construct.On Anthropology.net, Emanuel Lusca writes:First, race is a social construct contingent on collective acceptance, [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] very much.Short answer: No, there is no genetic basis for race that negates the social construct.On Anthropology.net, Emanuel Lusca writes:First, race is a social construct contingent on collective acceptance, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff Gassen</title>
		<link>http://anthropology.net/2008/10/01/race-as-a-social-construct/#comment-26405</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeff Gassen]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Aug 2011 15:32:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://anthropologynet.wordpress.com/?p=1396#comment-26405</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I actually have to disagree with the lack of genetic difference between races. There has been a plethora of studies indicating physical differences in physical prowess, testosterone levels, etc. that can&#039;t be attributed solely to cultural interference. I stress the most that &quot;different&quot; is not &quot;worse&quot; or &quot;better.&quot; You can&#039;t completely disregard that if you watch an NBA game 82% of the players are black, even though the game of basketball was originally played by white men. Also, this article seems to suggest that if the social construct of &quot;race&quot; were to disappear the lines between us would also. That couldn&#039;t be farther from the truth. Whether we want to believe it or not, our skin would still be different colors. 

Using Eminem as a reference to indicate racial differences were merely cultural differences is flawed in that Eminem is completely unique in his style than the majority of black hip-hop artists. Do I believe that racism is still alive and well. Absolutely. Do I think there is a propensity to white supremacy, particularly in America. Yes, I do. However, utilizing pre-Civil Rights court cases and references is not the way to expose it, nor is trying to pretend race is no more than a figment of our cognitive biases. Conservative policies in America continue again, and again never fail to separate the rich, white elite from the poor, urban minorities. I say minorities not because ONLY minorities are poor, but because of the social inequality that has taken place in our past and present, you can&#039;t talk about poverty without talking about race due to the high percentage of the minority poor. Unregulated capitalism in its purist form prevents those who have started at the bottom (many numbers of minorities have due to continued racism after the abolition of slavery, even after the Civil Rights movement) from competing in the market. The canon of capitalism is to create profit, not jobs or rights. 

Finally, I do agree with Fanon&#039;s final point that to cure society of racism, is not to end race, but for a paradigm shift. For all the reasons in the article, there are sociocultural differences between race NOW even if there are no biological differences other than the evolution of skin color based on region. We cannot pretend we are all the same, rather accept that we are all different and that is just fine. Being black, white, orange, red, green, yellow, purple, doesn&#039;t hurt anybody, nor does breing straight, gay, bisexual, transsexual. Hate is perpetuated by ignorance and lack of understanding is what gave birth to racism.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I actually have to disagree with the lack of genetic difference between races. There has been a plethora of studies indicating physical differences in physical prowess, testosterone levels, etc. that can&#8217;t be attributed solely to cultural interference. I stress the most that &#8220;different&#8221; is not &#8220;worse&#8221; or &#8220;better.&#8221; You can&#8217;t completely disregard that if you watch an NBA game 82% of the players are black, even though the game of basketball was originally played by white men. Also, this article seems to suggest that if the social construct of &#8220;race&#8221; were to disappear the lines between us would also. That couldn&#8217;t be farther from the truth. Whether we want to believe it or not, our skin would still be different colors. </p>
<p>Using Eminem as a reference to indicate racial differences were merely cultural differences is flawed in that Eminem is completely unique in his style than the majority of black hip-hop artists. Do I believe that racism is still alive and well. Absolutely. Do I think there is a propensity to white supremacy, particularly in America. Yes, I do. However, utilizing pre-Civil Rights court cases and references is not the way to expose it, nor is trying to pretend race is no more than a figment of our cognitive biases. Conservative policies in America continue again, and again never fail to separate the rich, white elite from the poor, urban minorities. I say minorities not because ONLY minorities are poor, but because of the social inequality that has taken place in our past and present, you can&#8217;t talk about poverty without talking about race due to the high percentage of the minority poor. Unregulated capitalism in its purist form prevents those who have started at the bottom (many numbers of minorities have due to continued racism after the abolition of slavery, even after the Civil Rights movement) from competing in the market. The canon of capitalism is to create profit, not jobs or rights. </p>
<p>Finally, I do agree with Fanon&#8217;s final point that to cure society of racism, is not to end race, but for a paradigm shift. For all the reasons in the article, there are sociocultural differences between race NOW even if there are no biological differences other than the evolution of skin color based on region. We cannot pretend we are all the same, rather accept that we are all different and that is just fine. Being black, white, orange, red, green, yellow, purple, doesn&#8217;t hurt anybody, nor does breing straight, gay, bisexual, transsexual. Hate is perpetuated by ignorance and lack of understanding is what gave birth to racism.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Race as a Social Construct &#124; Juan Stirner</title>
		<link>http://anthropology.net/2008/10/01/race-as-a-social-construct/#comment-26227</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Race as a Social Construct &#124; Juan Stirner]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Aug 2011 08:00:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://anthropologynet.wordpress.com/?p=1396#comment-26227</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] race is a social construct (a &#8216;social reality&#8217; is much more accurate of a term) does possess some truth. Although, those who deny race are blind to the actual implications behind their most religious [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] race is a social construct (a &#8216;social reality&#8217; is much more accurate of a term) does possess some truth. Although, those who deny race are blind to the actual implications behind their most religious [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: aeolious</title>
		<link>http://anthropology.net/2008/10/01/race-as-a-social-construct/#comment-25726</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[aeolious]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jul 2011 21:48:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://anthropologynet.wordpress.com/?p=1396#comment-25726</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Blast from the past. 1960&#039;s countercultralism. And pure Nurture over nature. Biology perhaps also 1960&#039;s.
Well not so long ago it was discovered that the rest of us but not Africans have some genetic material inherited from Neanderthals. Another group Desinovans also contributed to certain groups and there is no reason to suggest that we will not find other Eurasian ancestry that contributed genetic material to separate Asians from Caucasians.
Second there is just a plethora of studies about how animal groups tend to separate themselves by their DNA. Pre-speciation beior.hav
I suspect that a number of findings in the social sciences will have their basis in such separation mechanisms.
And just for the counter-culturists, most racial groups avoid interbreeding with other groups and the term &quot;half-breed&quot; has  rather ubiquitous analogs.
We are animals first and then maybe a few of us manage to put that behind us.
That wonderful song from &quot;South Pacific&quot; that suggests prejudice has to be taught, alas is only true in Bali Hi.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Blast from the past. 1960&#8242;s countercultralism. And pure Nurture over nature. Biology perhaps also 1960&#8242;s.<br />
Well not so long ago it was discovered that the rest of us but not Africans have some genetic material inherited from Neanderthals. Another group Desinovans also contributed to certain groups and there is no reason to suggest that we will not find other Eurasian ancestry that contributed genetic material to separate Asians from Caucasians.<br />
Second there is just a plethora of studies about how animal groups tend to separate themselves by their DNA. Pre-speciation beior.hav<br />
I suspect that a number of findings in the social sciences will have their basis in such separation mechanisms.<br />
And just for the counter-culturists, most racial groups avoid interbreeding with other groups and the term &#8220;half-breed&#8221; has  rather ubiquitous analogs.<br />
We are animals first and then maybe a few of us manage to put that behind us.<br />
That wonderful song from &#8220;South Pacific&#8221; that suggests prejudice has to be taught, alas is only true in Bali Hi.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Unamusement Park &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Big Lies</title>
		<link>http://anthropology.net/2008/10/01/race-as-a-social-construct/#comment-25169</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Unamusement Park &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Big Lies]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Jul 2011 23:47:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://anthropologynet.wordpress.com/?p=1396#comment-25169</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] the extremely ridiculous end of the spectrum, we have the &#8220;social construct&#8221; theory of race — a very popular, very post-modern, very stupid notion, with or without politicized junk science [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the extremely ridiculous end of the spectrum, we have the &#8220;social construct&#8221; theory of race — a very popular, very post-modern, very stupid notion, with or without politicized junk science [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Part II: Metaphorically Thinking &#124; The Laconic Writer</title>
		<link>http://anthropology.net/2008/10/01/race-as-a-social-construct/#comment-24029</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Part II: Metaphorically Thinking &#124; The Laconic Writer]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 May 2011 04:50:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://anthropologynet.wordpress.com/?p=1396#comment-24029</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] has often lead to confusion and unwanted results. A prime example of this is the use of the word race, which has both a biological/technical meaning, and a more powerful social/cultural [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] has often lead to confusion and unwanted results. A prime example of this is the use of the word race, which has both a biological/technical meaning, and a more powerful social/cultural [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Emanuel Lusca</title>
		<link>http://anthropology.net/2008/10/01/race-as-a-social-construct/#comment-23926</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Emanuel Lusca]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 May 2011 16:10:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://anthropologynet.wordpress.com/?p=1396#comment-23926</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Mr. Smith.... I&#039;m not black, and I&#039;m a pretty happy person. Thanks for the comment!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mr. Smith&#8230;. I&#8217;m not black, and I&#8217;m a pretty happy person. Thanks for the comment!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: &#34;RACISM&#34;? - There's No Such Thing - Page 6 - PureTalkForum Debate &#38; Discussion Forum</title>
		<link>http://anthropology.net/2008/10/01/race-as-a-social-construct/#comment-23601</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[&#34;RACISM&#34;? - There's No Such Thing - Page 6 - PureTalkForum Debate &#38; Discussion Forum]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Apr 2011 07:22:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://anthropologynet.wordpress.com/?p=1396#comment-23601</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Originally Posted by jackolantern   On the contrary. The race classifications that I was educated to understand were grouped in three very large sections. They were &#039;Caucasoid&#039;, &#039;Negroid&#039; and &#039;Asiatic&#039;. I have no problem with that. But when an Italian or Palestinian or Mexican is offended by a &#039;racist&#039; remark, it makes no sense. None of those nationalities is a &#039;race&#039; by my understanding. Clearly, the word has become standard currency for universal abuse and is a stand in for &#039;criticism&#039;. I have never seen it used except as an emotive weapon. Cheers.      An astute scientist would point out that those differentiations within the human race are actually clines, not races or sub-species.  The Myth of Race: America&#039;s Original Science Fiction Sign in to read: Return of the race myth? - opinion - 01 July 2009 - New Scientist Race As A Social Construct Anthropology.net [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Originally Posted by jackolantern   On the contrary. The race classifications that I was educated to understand were grouped in three very large sections. They were &#039;Caucasoid&#039;, &#039;Negroid&#039; and &#039;Asiatic&#039;. I have no problem with that. But when an Italian or Palestinian or Mexican is offended by a &#039;racist&#039; remark, it makes no sense. None of those nationalities is a &#039;race&#039; by my understanding. Clearly, the word has become standard currency for universal abuse and is a stand in for &#039;criticism&#039;. I have never seen it used except as an emotive weapon. Cheers.      An astute scientist would point out that those differentiations within the human race are actually clines, not races or sub-species.  The Myth of Race: America&#039;s Original Science Fiction Sign in to read: Return of the race myth? &#8211; opinion &#8211; 01 July 2009 &#8211; New Scientist Race As A Social Construct Anthropology.net [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

