<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The 4.4-Million-Year-Old Ardipithecus ramidus</title>
	<atom:link href="http://anthropology.net/2009/10/01/the-4-4-million-year-old-ardipithecus-ramidus/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://anthropology.net/2009/10/01/the-4-4-million-year-old-ardipithecus-ramidus/</link>
	<description>Beyond bones &#38; stones</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 May 2012 15:52:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christina</title>
		<link>http://anthropology.net/2009/10/01/the-4-4-million-year-old-ardipithecus-ramidus/#comment-27587</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Christina]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Sep 2011 02:02:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://anthropology.net/?p=2523#comment-27587</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Amen]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Amen</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Neandertal Draft Genome &#171; Anthropology.net</title>
		<link>http://anthropology.net/2009/10/01/the-4-4-million-year-old-ardipithecus-ramidus/#comment-17296</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[The Neandertal Draft Genome &#171; Anthropology.net]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 May 2010 02:11:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://anthropology.net/?p=2523#comment-17296</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] under the sea of books and notes for my upcoming exams to immerse myself in it. This happened with Ardipithecus last fall, and now with the draft of the Neandertal genome coming out tomorrow, I can&#8217;t help [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] under the sea of books and notes for my upcoming exams to immerse myself in it. This happened with Ardipithecus last fall, and now with the draft of the Neandertal genome coming out tomorrow, I can&#8217;t help [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ginnifer Cosgrove</title>
		<link>http://anthropology.net/2009/10/01/the-4-4-million-year-old-ardipithecus-ramidus/#comment-14928</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ginnifer Cosgrove]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2009 18:37:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://anthropology.net/?p=2523#comment-14928</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m a 16 year old Junior and to be learning this at such a young age is quite simply amazing. I&#039;m not sure that most would believe I&#039;m only 16 but I am and this is the most amazing discovery of my generation. I one day hope to become an archaeoligist so I too can make amazing discoveries as this one. I might not find such an old or well preserved specimen as this but it&#039;d be cool to be recognized as someone important so that when I do find cool stuff I&#039;d be invited to do digs this important to human history. I want to leave my own footprints so that our future selves can find them yet again millions of years from now.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m a 16 year old Junior and to be learning this at such a young age is quite simply amazing. I&#8217;m not sure that most would believe I&#8217;m only 16 but I am and this is the most amazing discovery of my generation. I one day hope to become an archaeoligist so I too can make amazing discoveries as this one. I might not find such an old or well preserved specimen as this but it&#8217;d be cool to be recognized as someone important so that when I do find cool stuff I&#8217;d be invited to do digs this important to human history. I want to leave my own footprints so that our future selves can find them yet again millions of years from now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: squareONE explorations &#187; Blog Archiv &#187; I Love Ardi</title>
		<link>http://anthropology.net/2009/10/01/the-4-4-million-year-old-ardipithecus-ramidus/#comment-14847</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[squareONE explorations &#187; Blog Archiv &#187; I Love Ardi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 14:54:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://anthropology.net/?p=2523#comment-14847</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Ardi page * White and colleagues 2009b give a long table of “derived” characters in Ardipithecus and [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Ardi page * White and colleagues 2009b give a long table of “derived” characters in Ardipithecus and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mailund on the Internet &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Ardi, Ardi, Ardi&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://anthropology.net/2009/10/01/the-4-4-million-year-old-ardipithecus-ramidus/#comment-14845</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mailund on the Internet &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Ardi, Ardi, Ardi&#8230;]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 07:36:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://anthropology.net/?p=2523#comment-14845</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] The 4.4 million year old Ardipithecus ramidus (Anthropology.net) [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The 4.4 million year old Ardipithecus ramidus (Anthropology.net) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: prancingpapio</title>
		<link>http://anthropology.net/2009/10/01/the-4-4-million-year-old-ardipithecus-ramidus/#comment-14841</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[prancingpapio]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 05:10:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://anthropology.net/?p=2523#comment-14841</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Still lower lvl than Lucy though ... must be a beta Tauren with plain striding. 

Apologies to those who have no idea what I&#039;m talking about. Brownie points to those who do.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Still lower lvl than Lucy though &#8230; must be a beta Tauren with plain striding. </p>
<p>Apologies to those who have no idea what I&#8217;m talking about. Brownie points to those who do.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Science Publishes 11 Papers On Ardipithecus ramidus &#171; Anthropology.net</title>
		<link>http://anthropology.net/2009/10/01/the-4-4-million-year-old-ardipithecus-ramidus/#comment-14835</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Science Publishes 11 Papers On Ardipithecus ramidus &#171; Anthropology.net]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 00:00:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://anthropology.net/?p=2523#comment-14835</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Links        The 4.4-Million-Year-Old Ardipithecus&#160;ramidus [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Links        The 4.4-Million-Year-Old Ardipithecus&nbsp;ramidus [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kambiz</title>
		<link>http://anthropology.net/2009/10/01/the-4-4-million-year-old-ardipithecus-ramidus/#comment-14834</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kambiz]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2009 23:21:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://anthropology.net/?p=2523#comment-14834</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yay Ardi! Gratz on dinging! ;-)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yay Ardi! Gratz on dinging! ;-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: prancingpapio</title>
		<link>http://anthropology.net/2009/10/01/the-4-4-million-year-old-ardipithecus-ramidus/#comment-14830</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[prancingpapio]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2009 21:31:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://anthropology.net/?p=2523#comment-14830</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#039;s finally here!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s finally here!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Keesey</title>
		<link>http://anthropology.net/2009/10/01/the-4-4-million-year-old-ardipithecus-ramidus/#comment-14829</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mike Keesey]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2009 19:31:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://anthropology.net/?p=2523#comment-14829</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;changes the notion that humans and chimps, our closest genetic cousins, both trace their lineage to a creature that was more like today’s chimp &quot;

The ancestor would still be more chimp-like than human-like in most features. And this specimen doesn&#039;t clear up all of the uncertainties about that ancestor, since it&#039;s on the human side of things. We&#039;d need a well-preserved member of the human-chimpanzee stem group to be certain about the polarity of all of these features.

&quot;What this means is that our common ancestor was a bipedal forest forager&quot;

*Facultatively* bipedal. This has already been suspected for a while, so it&#039;s nice to see it confirmed.

&quot;and that chimps were an evolutionary offshoot&quot;

Again, we already knew this (or should have). This wonderful specimen clears up some particulars, though.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;changes the notion that humans and chimps, our closest genetic cousins, both trace their lineage to a creature that was more like today’s chimp &#8221;</p>
<p>The ancestor would still be more chimp-like than human-like in most features. And this specimen doesn&#8217;t clear up all of the uncertainties about that ancestor, since it&#8217;s on the human side of things. We&#8217;d need a well-preserved member of the human-chimpanzee stem group to be certain about the polarity of all of these features.</p>
<p>&#8220;What this means is that our common ancestor was a bipedal forest forager&#8221;</p>
<p>*Facultatively* bipedal. This has already been suspected for a while, so it&#8217;s nice to see it confirmed.</p>
<p>&#8220;and that chimps were an evolutionary offshoot&#8221;</p>
<p>Again, we already knew this (or should have). This wonderful specimen clears up some particulars, though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

