<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Evidence for food storage and predomestication granaries 11,000 years ago in the Jordan Valley</title>
	<atom:link href="http://anthropology.net/2009/10/26/evidence-for-food-storage-and-predomestication-granaries-11000-years-ago-in-the-jordan-valley/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://anthropology.net/2009/10/26/evidence-for-food-storage-and-predomestication-granaries-11000-years-ago-in-the-jordan-valley/</link>
	<description>Beyond bones &#38; stones</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 20:33:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Luis</title>
		<link>http://anthropology.net/2009/10/26/evidence-for-food-storage-and-predomestication-granaries-11000-years-ago-in-the-jordan-valley/#comment-15068</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Luis]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 15:01:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://anthropology.net/?p=2589#comment-15068</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks for the link. I had already read the SD article but had no direct link to the paper, so I was like missing info. 

What puzzles me a bit in this issue is that all the granary data comes from PPNA sites, which are by definition already Neolithic (transitional if you wish). The emphasis seems to be in that they still did not have the modified plants we see later on but only wild variants. 

So I&#039;m kind of confused: is Kuijt trying to re-define PPNA as Mesolithic (not fully Neolithic but transitional)? Or is just a technical matter?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the link. I had already read the SD article but had no direct link to the paper, so I was like missing info. </p>
<p>What puzzles me a bit in this issue is that all the granary data comes from PPNA sites, which are by definition already Neolithic (transitional if you wish). The emphasis seems to be in that they still did not have the modified plants we see later on but only wild variants. </p>
<p>So I&#8217;m kind of confused: is Kuijt trying to re-define PPNA as Mesolithic (not fully Neolithic but transitional)? Or is just a technical matter?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dearieme</title>
		<link>http://anthropology.net/2009/10/26/evidence-for-food-storage-and-predomestication-granaries-11000-years-ago-in-the-jordan-valley/#comment-15066</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[dearieme]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 13:27:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://anthropology.net/?p=2589#comment-15066</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Gosh, an elegantly precise use of &quot;comprise&quot;.  You don&#039;t often see that .]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gosh, an elegantly precise use of &#8220;comprise&#8221;.  You don&#8217;t often see that .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

