<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Four Stone Hearth #81@ SpiderMonkeyTales</title>
	<atom:link href="http://anthropology.net/2009/12/06/four-stone-hearth-81-spidermonkeytales/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://anthropology.net/2009/12/06/four-stone-hearth-81-spidermonkeytales/</link>
	<description>Beyond bones &#38; stones</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 20:33:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rod Chilton</title>
		<link>http://anthropology.net/2009/12/06/four-stone-hearth-81-spidermonkeytales/#comment-15633</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rod Chilton]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Dec 2009 17:52:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://anthropology.net/?p=2758#comment-15633</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Dear Tim and Kimbiz: Thank-you for your interesting summation of the debate regarding the comet hypothesis and the Younger Dryas stadial. I have been in touch with Dr. Surowell and Dr. Tyler Faith about their papers, and have in fact received copies of their work. I was not aware of Dr. Firestone&#039;s synthesis of what he sees as inadequacies in the research of those skeptical of comet impact. I have over the past eight years of accumulating all the evidence I could locate arrived at a similar conclusion as the Firestone group. I have come to this conclusion independently from the group of 27 scientists that Dr. Firestone represents. I wish to direct you to my website as shown above and inform you of my book that I call &quot;Sudden Cold An Examination of the Younger Dryas Cold Reversal&quot; I have found that with some exceptions (namely Dr. William Napier, Dr. Mike Baillie and Dr. Mark Bailey) very little acknowledgement of my work has been forthcoming on what I believe could be an important cornerstone in the Younger Dryas debate. Thank-you for this opportunity to present some of views. Yours sincerely, Rod Chilton, climatologist.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Tim and Kimbiz: Thank-you for your interesting summation of the debate regarding the comet hypothesis and the Younger Dryas stadial. I have been in touch with Dr. Surowell and Dr. Tyler Faith about their papers, and have in fact received copies of their work. I was not aware of Dr. Firestone&#8217;s synthesis of what he sees as inadequacies in the research of those skeptical of comet impact. I have over the past eight years of accumulating all the evidence I could locate arrived at a similar conclusion as the Firestone group. I have come to this conclusion independently from the group of 27 scientists that Dr. Firestone represents. I wish to direct you to my website as shown above and inform you of my book that I call &#8220;Sudden Cold An Examination of the Younger Dryas Cold Reversal&#8221; I have found that with some exceptions (namely Dr. William Napier, Dr. Mike Baillie and Dr. Mark Bailey) very little acknowledgement of my work has been forthcoming on what I believe could be an important cornerstone in the Younger Dryas debate. Thank-you for this opportunity to present some of views. Yours sincerely, Rod Chilton, climatologist.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

