Comments on: The Clovis Comet That Wasn’t? Mystery Deepens

By: Dennis Cox

Dennis Cox — Fri, 14 May 2010 15:01:49 +0000

The trouble as I see it, is that all of the Earth sciences are trying to percieve, and make sense of, the most violent natural catastrophe in 65 million years while wearing 150 year old, uniformitarian blinders. They’re like blind scholars studying an elephant they can’t even imagine. And the elephant is in the room with them.

As long as the Earth sciences are founded on the unquestioned uniformitarian asumptions of Sir Charles Lyell, they will never be able to recognize the planetary scaring of a recent, extinction level, multiple airburst, thermal atmospheric, geo-ablative impact event. Not even if they’re living right in the middle of the blast effected materials of the primary impact zone.

See http://craterhunter.wordpress.com/ for more.

By: William Astley

William Astley — Sun, 28 Mar 2010 03:21:47 +0000

There is a geomagnetic excursion that correlates with the Younger Dryas cooling event. There are other geomagnetic excursions that correlate with other previous Heinrich abrupt cooling events. (Heinrich events occur with a periodicity of roughly 6000 to 8000 years).

There are 10 abrupt secular geomagnetic field changes (referred to as archeomagnetic jerks) in the last 5000 years. There are also cooling events that are associated with the archeomagnetic jerks. The archeomagnetic jerks (The tilt of the geomagnetic field is changed during the archeomagnetic jerk event.) are a smaller version of what occurred during to cause the Younger Dryas abrupt cooling event.

It appears the Younger Dryas burn marks are caused by a cyclic solar event. The solar magnetic cycle is interrupted and when it restarts there are a series of very strong coronal mass ejections. The burn marks are an electrical discharge from the ionosphere to the surface of the planet.

The cooling occurs due to Svensmark’s mechanism. The geomagnetic field intensity modulates the amount of galactic cosmic rays GCR (high energy protons) that strikes the atmosphere which in turn modulates planetary cloud cover. The affect is greatest at higher latitudes (above around 40 degrees). When the tilt of the geomagnetic field changes the geomagnetic poles move towards the equator which increase cloud cover in lower latitudes. An example of a previous more recent strike is the South Atlantic geomagnetic anomaly.

(Comment: The GCR is also modulated by solar wind bursts that create a space charge differential in the ionosphere which in turn removes cloud forming ions. Tinsley’s electroscavenging mechanism. During the last two solar cycles there has been a significant increase in solar wind bursts particularly during the end of the cycle.)

The liquid core of the planet integrates the abrupt secular change to the geomagnetic field which either increases the total strength of the field or decreases the geomagnetic field depending on the hemisphere where the strike occurs and the polarity of the strike as compared to the polarity of the current geomagnetic field alignment.

Geomagnetic excursions are the same mechanism with a stronger strike. During geomagnetic excursions the total geomagnetic field intensity is decreased and the affect is the greatest. (The liquid core has a time constant of around 2000 years, so it initially resists any change. Also the strike creates a magnetic anomaly which is integrated into a polar field by the liquid core.)

The Younger Dryas cooling occurred over roughly 15 years and lasted for approximately 800 years. That strike reinforced the field and the field intensity increased.)

The ice sheets insulate the planet and hence shield it from this cycle event which explains why the geomagnetic field intensity is roughly 5 to 6 times less during the majority of the glacial phase.

There is concurrent with the geomagnetic excursions a significant increase in volcanic eruptions and a significant increase in large volcanic eruptions.

If you look at the Carolina Bay burn marks there is evidence of strike and re-strike. The burn marks overlap, are elliptical, with the axis pointing the North-west direction. (The electrical strike aligns with the earth’s magnetic field and the strike is elliptical due the rotation of the planet during the strike.)

http://www.springerlink.com/content/k6x20160542j846q/

http://www.agu.org/pubs/crossref/2006/2006GL027284.shtml

This is an interesting problem from the standpoint of solar physics also.

Geomagnetic excursion captured by multiple volcanoes in a monogenetic field

http://www.pnas.org/content/101/17/6341.full

By: Rod Del

Rod Del — Tue, 09 Mar 2010 20:18:49 +0000

Dear Mathematician/ Pawnee,
In 1937 the state of Montana conducted its first archeological dig “The Hagen Site”. Established as a National Historical Landmark in 1964 (it is presently undeveloped, and for sale).
The site is unusual due to the pottery and structure excavated at the site. The pottery is extremely advanced with a style that is hard to account for. The structure was built as a stationary building.
The equation; the lodge has a 16 foot diameter with 12 supporting posts. The front door faces to the sun raise with two posts 6 feet apart, the center has two posts 4 feet apart, the west wall has two post 2 feet apart. Being that the lodge is round, a sacred native symbol; I circled the other two points, the inner and outer circles.
Now you have your equation; A to B to C, gives you a 15 degree angle (1/24 of 360).
The three proportional circles are now called out, and all 3 fit with-in the equation.
Hope you can enjoy this Native American Star geometry as much as I have. This shows they had the Knowledge of Natures structure which is found in all creation.
hopimigration.com Star Band found at site

By: George Howard

George Howard — Thu, 10 Dec 2009 15:05:27 +0000

Thanks for your blog on this Anthro.net. The YDB hypothesis debate is messy but wonderful science. I have not yet read your blog carefully but wanted to encourage you and your readers to carefully examine ALL the abstracts for Fall AGU concerning the hypothesis and evidence — con and pro. There has been no coverage of the supportive new evidence; including, Tom Stafford finding at Halls Cave in Texas, Marie-Agnes Courty’s finding the YDB on the French Atlantic Coast, the Peruvian Desert and the Caspian Sea.

All abstacts here:
Oral presentations:
http://snipurl.com/smuv4

Poster presentations:
http://snipurl.com/smuur