<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Lithic Assemblage Dated to 1.57 Million Years Found at Lézignan-la-Cébe, Southern France</title>
	<atom:link href="http://anthropology.net/2009/12/16/lithic-assemblage-dated-to-1-57-million-years-found-at-lezignan-la-cebe-southern-france/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://anthropology.net/2009/12/16/lithic-assemblage-dated-to-1-57-million-years-found-at-lezignan-la-cebe-southern-france/</link>
	<description>Beyond bones &#38; stones</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 May 2012 15:52:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Giorgio Chelidonio</title>
		<link>http://anthropology.net/2009/12/16/lithic-assemblage-dated-to-1-57-million-years-found-at-lezignan-la-cebe-southern-france/#comment-23456</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Giorgio Chelidonio]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Apr 2011 07:52:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://anthropology.net/?p=2881#comment-23456</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Quartzite tools are often difficult to detect from geofacts, much more than flint or chert artifacts (although vitreous stones&#039; geofacts are also produced by stream flowing conditions). Moreover, different styles in drawing artifacts (or geofacts) lead to a personal interpretation of the objetcs. Neverthless 1,57 MA stone tools seem to be compatible with current paleo-scenaries and need better attention]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Quartzite tools are often difficult to detect from geofacts, much more than flint or chert artifacts (although vitreous stones&#8217; geofacts are also produced by stream flowing conditions). Moreover, different styles in drawing artifacts (or geofacts) lead to a personal interpretation of the objetcs. Neverthless 1,57 MA stone tools seem to be compatible with current paleo-scenaries and need better attention</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: onyx</title>
		<link>http://anthropology.net/2009/12/16/lithic-assemblage-dated-to-1-57-million-years-found-at-lezignan-la-cebe-southern-france/#comment-16333</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[onyx]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 08:38:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://anthropology.net/?p=2881#comment-16333</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[dont agree more modern then oldowan. more shapes and more shaping, higher nr of flakes removed per pebble. ancient tho, well you can&#039;t expect real oldowan in europe, and these froms immediatly follow that to persist for 100&#039;s k&#039;s of years.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>dont agree more modern then oldowan. more shapes and more shaping, higher nr of flakes removed per pebble. ancient tho, well you can&#8217;t expect real oldowan in europe, and these froms immediatly follow that to persist for 100&#8242;s k&#8217;s of years.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: terryt</title>
		<link>http://anthropology.net/2009/12/16/lithic-assemblage-dated-to-1-57-million-years-found-at-lezignan-la-cebe-southern-france/#comment-15707</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[terryt]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2010 09:11:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://anthropology.net/?p=2881#comment-15707</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;Definately Olduwan tool technology not Acheulean&quot;.  

Thanks.  I thought so.  The Acheulean is an early example of a technology that failed to reach marginal areas of the contemporary human geographic distribution.  Much the same as blade technology, microlithic technology and even the whole Upper Paleolithic.  We&#039;re standing on shakey ground when we associate specific technolgies with specific human species.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Definately Olduwan tool technology not Acheulean&#8221;.  </p>
<p>Thanks.  I thought so.  The Acheulean is an early example of a technology that failed to reach marginal areas of the contemporary human geographic distribution.  Much the same as blade technology, microlithic technology and even the whole Upper Paleolithic.  We&#8217;re standing on shakey ground when we associate specific technolgies with specific human species.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Four Stone Hearth #83 &#8211; The Avatar Edition [The Primate Diaries] &#171; Random Information</title>
		<link>http://anthropology.net/2009/12/16/lithic-assemblage-dated-to-1-57-million-years-found-at-lezignan-la-cebe-southern-france/#comment-15680</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Four Stone Hearth #83 &#8211; The Avatar Edition [The Primate Diaries] &#171; Random Information]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Dec 2009 11:18:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://anthropology.net/?p=2881#comment-15680</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Anthropology.net describes the latest discovery of a &quot;Lithic Assemblage Dated to 1.57 Million Years Found at Lézignan-la-Cébe, Southern France&quot;. [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Anthropology.net describes the latest discovery of a &quot;Lithic Assemblage Dated to 1.57 Million Years Found at Lézignan-la-Cébe, Southern France&quot;. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan</title>
		<link>http://anthropology.net/2009/12/16/lithic-assemblage-dated-to-1-57-million-years-found-at-lezignan-la-cebe-southern-france/#comment-15678</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Dec 2009 01:51:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://anthropology.net/?p=2881#comment-15678</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Definately Olduwan tool technology not Acheulean. Looks like core tools, amorphous cores, expedient flake tool behavior. Same as Olduwan, or even older Lower Paleolithic stuff.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Definately Olduwan tool technology not Acheulean. Looks like core tools, amorphous cores, expedient flake tool behavior. Same as Olduwan, or even older Lower Paleolithic stuff.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: terryt</title>
		<link>http://anthropology.net/2009/12/16/lithic-assemblage-dated-to-1-57-million-years-found-at-lezignan-la-cebe-southern-france/#comment-15628</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[terryt]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Dec 2009 02:07:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://anthropology.net/?p=2881#comment-15628</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Those Homo erectus certainly got around rapidly once they&#039;d left Africa.  Spread from Western Europe to Northeast Asia and even way down into SE Asia.  

&quot;From the description given, the tools from Lézignan-la-Cébe appear to correspond to the Acheulean industry&quot;  

I don&#039;t think so.  I thought hand-axes were diagnostic of Acheulean.  No hand-axes evident in this assemblage.  Hand-axes seem to be a more recent development and spread through just part of the H. erectus geographic range.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Those Homo erectus certainly got around rapidly once they&#8217;d left Africa.  Spread from Western Europe to Northeast Asia and even way down into SE Asia.  </p>
<p>&#8220;From the description given, the tools from Lézignan-la-Cébe appear to correspond to the Acheulean industry&#8221;  </p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think so.  I thought hand-axes were diagnostic of Acheulean.  No hand-axes evident in this assemblage.  Hand-axes seem to be a more recent development and spread through just part of the H. erectus geographic range.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

