<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Anthropology.net</title>
	<atom:link href="http://anthropology.net/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://anthropology.net</link>
	<description>Beyond bones &#38; stones</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 19:43:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Impact of Selection and Demography on the Diffusion of Lactase Persistence &#8211; PLoS ONE by Luis</title>
		<link>http://anthropology.net/2009/07/24/impact-of-selection-and-demography-on-the-diffusion-of-lactase-persistence-plos-one/#comment-15169</link>
		<dc:creator>Luis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 19:43:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://anthropology.net/?p=2310#comment-15169</guid>
		<description>Vitamin D is &lt;a href=&quot;http://leherensuge.blogspot.com/search?q=vitamin+D&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;much more&lt;/a&gt; than mere rickets. Vitamin D is essential for correct brain development in embryos and children, for good bactericidal response and even prevents artherosclerosis.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Vitamin D is <a href="http://leherensuge.blogspot.com/search?q=vitamin+D" rel="nofollow">much more</a> than mere rickets. Vitamin D is essential for correct brain development in embryos and children, for good bactericidal response and even prevents artherosclerosis.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Claude Lévi-Strauss Has Died by Four Stone Hearth 79 @ Anthropology.net &#171; Anthropology.net</title>
		<link>http://anthropology.net/2009/11/03/claude-levi-strauss-has-died/#comment-15167</link>
		<dc:creator>Four Stone Hearth 79 @ Anthropology.net &#171; Anthropology.net</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 10:45:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://anthropology.net/?p=2614#comment-15167</guid>
		<description>[...] Links        Claude Lévi-Strauss Has&#160;Died [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Links        Claude Lévi-Strauss Has&nbsp;Died [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Impact of Selection and Demography on the Diffusion of Lactase Persistence &#8211; PLoS ONE by maria</title>
		<link>http://anthropology.net/2009/07/24/impact-of-selection-and-demography-on-the-diffusion-of-lactase-persistence-plos-one/#comment-15163</link>
		<dc:creator>maria</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 03:45:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://anthropology.net/?p=2310#comment-15163</guid>
		<description>pretty interesting archaeogenetics.  has anyone studied whether vitamin d production differences in the northernmost regions of europe versus the southernmost regions is so vastly different that rickets is more of a problem in say, scandinavia compared to northern spain?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>pretty interesting archaeogenetics.  has anyone studied whether vitamin d production differences in the northernmost regions of europe versus the southernmost regions is so vastly different that rickets is more of a problem in say, scandinavia compared to northern spain?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Claude Lévi-Strauss Has Died by German Dziebel</title>
		<link>http://anthropology.net/2009/11/03/claude-levi-strauss-has-died/#comment-15160</link>
		<dc:creator>German Dziebel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 01:30:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://anthropology.net/?p=2614#comment-15160</guid>
		<description>I owe Levi-Strauss a lot, in the very least my interest in comparative ethnology. His work on kinship was called a &quot;brilliant failure.&quot; This may be true. On the other hand, his theory of myth and of the mind was a big success. The human mind does work in opposites.
May he rest in peace.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I owe Levi-Strauss a lot, in the very least my interest in comparative ethnology. His work on kinship was called a &#8220;brilliant failure.&#8221; This may be true. On the other hand, his theory of myth and of the mind was a big success. The human mind does work in opposites.<br />
May he rest in peace.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Claude Lévi-Strauss Has Died by Luis Zaldivar</title>
		<link>http://anthropology.net/2009/11/03/claude-levi-strauss-has-died/#comment-15156</link>
		<dc:creator>Luis Zaldivar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 20:30:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://anthropology.net/?p=2614#comment-15156</guid>
		<description>Everything I believe in anthropology is in strict contradiction to everything Levi Srauss said, but I guess he would say that&#039;s just another damn binary position.

He will be missed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Everything I believe in anthropology is in strict contradiction to everything Levi Srauss said, but I guess he would say that&#8217;s just another damn binary position.</p>
<p>He will be missed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Nate Dominy receives the Packard Fellowship by Le giovani promesse della scienza mondiale &#171; Paoblog&#39;s Weblog</title>
		<link>http://anthropology.net/2007/10/10/nate-dominy-receives-the-packard-fellowship/#comment-15150</link>
		<dc:creator>Le giovani promesse della scienza mondiale &#171; Paoblog&#39;s Weblog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 08:27:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://anthropology.net/2007/10/10/nate-dominy-receives-the-packard-fellowship/#comment-15150</guid>
		<description>[...] ricerche di Nate Dominy servono per illuminare gli scienziati sull&#8217;importanza che il cibo ha avuto [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] ricerche di Nate Dominy servono per illuminare gli scienziati sull&#8217;importanza che il cibo ha avuto [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Grandma Plays Favourites: X-Chromosome Relatedness and Sex-specific Childhood Mortality &#8211; Proceedings of the Royal Society B by onyx</title>
		<link>http://anthropology.net/2009/10/29/grandma-plays-favourites-x-chromosome-relatedness-and-sex-specific-childhood-mortality-proceedings-of-the-royal-society-b/#comment-15148</link>
		<dc:creator>onyx</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 04:17:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://anthropology.net/?p=2597#comment-15148</guid>
		<description>i also think it will be easy to proof pgm&#039;s function more/better for the survival of grandchildren when they are more sure. i am however quite convinced that mgm&#039;s function more easily in that sense. for an example, woman have cells of all their children in their body&#039;s specifically the brain, 
i think it has much a do with the natural direction of their biological empathy&#039;s. (and thus that genes are not all-telling persee , but they are that in combination with merely physical (biological) factors). interestingly that poses the question who was first (the bird or the egg) and when exactly did genetics incorporate these biological effects, pretty well possible before we ever grew into sth. more then a primate, and possibly long before that. allthough the same matter of it&#039;s allways an egg before a bird, interestingly we could perhaps pinpoint a few of the related genetic developments on a timescale. btw. for animals smell usually suffices to make the distinction, and it would be somewhat farfetched to assume humans would have lost all that capacity to turn into humans, altho that be kinda nice and contrary to existing theory.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i also think it will be easy to proof pgm&#8217;s function more/better for the survival of grandchildren when they are more sure. i am however quite convinced that mgm&#8217;s function more easily in that sense. for an example, woman have cells of all their children in their body&#8217;s specifically the brain,<br />
i think it has much a do with the natural direction of their biological empathy&#8217;s. (and thus that genes are not all-telling persee , but they are that in combination with merely physical (biological) factors). interestingly that poses the question who was first (the bird or the egg) and when exactly did genetics incorporate these biological effects, pretty well possible before we ever grew into sth. more then a primate, and possibly long before that. allthough the same matter of it&#8217;s allways an egg before a bird, interestingly we could perhaps pinpoint a few of the related genetic developments on a timescale. btw. for animals smell usually suffices to make the distinction, and it would be somewhat farfetched to assume humans would have lost all that capacity to turn into humans, altho that be kinda nice and contrary to existing theory.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Grandma Plays Favourites: X-Chromosome Relatedness and Sex-specific Childhood Mortality &#8211; Proceedings of the Royal Society B by onyx</title>
		<link>http://anthropology.net/2009/10/29/grandma-plays-favourites-x-chromosome-relatedness-and-sex-specific-childhood-mortality-proceedings-of-the-royal-society-b/#comment-15147</link>
		<dc:creator>onyx</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 03:58:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://anthropology.net/?p=2597#comment-15147</guid>
		<description>wich i technically doubt, simply put we are all offspring of murderous victors, at least in europe. any gene that prominently expresses thus implies that exact result of survivability, i just doubt it did that much to our social structures , i expect more that genes will show to be coherent to neccesary quality&#039;s of that surround. more of a bottom-up thing, then a top-down thing. perhaps it will be debated in eternity.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>wich i technically doubt, simply put we are all offspring of murderous victors, at least in europe. any gene that prominently expresses thus implies that exact result of survivability, i just doubt it did that much to our social structures , i expect more that genes will show to be coherent to neccesary quality&#8217;s of that surround. more of a bottom-up thing, then a top-down thing. perhaps it will be debated in eternity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Four Stone Hearth 79 &#8211; Call for Submissions by onyx</title>
		<link>http://anthropology.net/2009/11/01/four-stone-hearth-79-call-for-submissions/#comment-15146</link>
		<dc:creator>onyx</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 03:52:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://anthropology.net/?p=2610#comment-15146</guid>
		<description>you know it is rather awfull for me to have realised this a long time ago, and still see gentech mess up the reality&#039;s of survival? well it is.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>you know it is rather awfull for me to have realised this a long time ago, and still see gentech mess up the reality&#8217;s of survival? well it is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Grandma Plays Favourites: X-Chromosome Relatedness and Sex-specific Childhood Mortality &#8211; Proceedings of the Royal Society B by terryt</title>
		<link>http://anthropology.net/2009/10/29/grandma-plays-favourites-x-chromosome-relatedness-and-sex-specific-childhood-mortality-proceedings-of-the-royal-society-b/#comment-15145</link>
		<dc:creator>terryt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 03:13:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://anthropology.net/?p=2597#comment-15145</guid>
		<description>&quot;their survival rates granted them a niche automatically, and not so much that the niche granted them survival rates&quot;.  

You might have something there.  At any rate I think the survival of particular offspring is unlikely to be simply the result of genes on the X chromosome.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;their survival rates granted them a niche automatically, and not so much that the niche granted them survival rates&#8221;.  </p>
<p>You might have something there.  At any rate I think the survival of particular offspring is unlikely to be simply the result of genes on the X chromosome.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>