The Indo-European Branches of the Language Tree

35 thoughts on “The Indo-European Branches of the Language Tree

Add yours

  1. This language tree was an excellent read. I wonder what electromagnetic communication deviation system caused the original language splits, and how it can be taken from the human mental/social circuit.

  2. William Bunker wondered, “what electromagnetic communication deviation system caused the original language split?” My guess would be that, like species, as the original language spread out different regions lost contact with each other. The languages formed a cline, then broke into dialects and eventually became different languages.

  3. What the f..k is this s..t?! Where the hell is the Macedonian language, huh?! Why nobody put my language in this group? Or in any group at ALL! Sorry but this tree is NOT true the whole

  4. Giviet, this kind of language and tone is not welcomed here. I have edited your commented to ‘remove’ the inappropriate words. You have been banned from commenting any further on this site.

    I am informing everyone that anyone else who chooses to comment in this tone will be permanently banned without warning.

  5. I don’t know where Singhalese is. And quite frankly I’m sick of hosting these sorts of questions. You’re not the first to ask, but you will be the last.

    Is this a comprehensive language tree? No it is not, you should know that before posting. It is a nice cartoon illustration that comes from Gamkrelidze and Ivanov’s, “The Early History of Indo-European Languages” which was printed in Scientific American in March 1990. If you have any questions why X language isn’t included in the tree, people should try and contact the people who made the tree.

  6. Erin. I’m pretty sure Singhalese is a branch of Indic. The tree doesn’t group the Indic languages into subfamilies so you’ll have to follow that up yourself.

  7. this tree is has been made by a jerk of linguistic. where is the Albanian, one of the oldest language of Europe?

  8. This diagram fails to address the tree as a whole in my opinion from known depository sources that have not been thoroughly examined yet, for example: None of my immediate family speaks German what so ever, and that I’ve never taken language courses in German what so ever, But that when I attempt to read German I can see the singularities… such as in words slightly misspelled or in different pronunciation, (but same meaning) Also pitch in conversation (or topic at hand ) helps me to better understand what is being conveyed, LOL yea I can pick that out , anyways I’m not here to bash the artist but I was really looking for a language tree that dates around the Sumerian times to present: (4000bc to present), However I’de Like to express that I am very opened minded about this topic so please reply with thoughts or facts.
    :) <— ( :), LOL )internet language).

    1. there arent native north americans, they are dead. In LA you have several studies and language trees regarding native people. Just google it. Brazilian itself is for this reason a completely different language than Portuguese on many terms, from grammar to phonetic from verbs to several words. Language scientists” dont like that differentiation. Neither the european cause they are afraid ppl say there have no linkages to their (ex) pure exploitation colonies.

  9. Everyone should know that language trees are all somewhat hypothetical. This does not make them uninteresting, though. It is rather sad how so many languages are dying around the world. By the way Kambiz, thanks for trying to keep the comments in line (tough job on the internet).

  10. The picture shows this is just a branch of the tree, what I would like to see is the rest of the tree stemming from the ‘mother language’. D

  11. Nonsense. The three itself and the branches area do not represent anything. It is lacking some languages and shows other really dead ones. German speakers are aprx. 110 million and portuguese 300 million, it’s not even there. If english and german are so germanic why do you use feckin latin alphabet? How come english is so heavy on french words. I think you are a bit too nazi.

  12. This tree is not complete. There are languages like for exemple Portuguese, Occitain or Catalan that should be in the Latin branch and they are not. Is that a reason to avoid them?

  13. Where is Yiddish? It is one of the few languages to have a winner of the Nobel Prize write in the language. I look forward to a reply. Thank you.

Leave a Reply to Era Cancel reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

A WordPress.com Website.

Up ↑