The Indo-European Branches of the Language Tree 35 thoughts on “The Indo-European Branches of the Language Tree” Add yours Probably this is because I have a computer science background, but this could possibly be one of the most unreadable visualization of a language tree! Reply I agree with the previous commenter. The data itself is fascinating and beautiful. Why ruin it with a cheesy “tree” illustration, which adds no information — and in fact, *subtracts* information by making it harder to read and understand the relationships among the data? I highly recommend this article on Edward Tufte’s website on the topic: http://www.edwardtufte.com/bboard/q-and-a-fetch-msg?msg_id=0001TV Cheers, Ari Reply This language tree was an excellent read. I wonder what electromagnetic communication deviation system caused the original language splits, and how it can be taken from the human mental/social circuit. Reply Vishnuvyas. You might find the tree in this paper useful. It’s an older paper by Gray and Atkinson, the ones who did the paper on Indian expansion Kambiz has just posted: Reply Pingback: El árbol lingüístico indoeuropeo « Mare Magnum I want to see the WHOLE TREE! Reply William Bunker wondered, “what electromagnetic communication deviation system caused the original language split?” My guess would be that, like species, as the original language spread out different regions lost contact with each other. The languages formed a cline, then broke into dialects and eventually became different languages. Reply Wow, fantastic presentation combined with a wealth of information. Reply Pingback: Mare Magnum | El árbol lingüístico indoeuropeo What the f..k is this s..t?! Where the hell is the Macedonian language, huh?! Why nobody put my language in this group? Or in any group at ALL! Sorry but this tree is NOT true the whole Reply Hello, Giviet. I would love fore there to be a complete tree on the origin of languages, cultures, faiths, and everything else relating to the origin of humanity. Reply Giviet, this kind of language and tone is not welcomed here. I have edited your commented to ‘remove’ the inappropriate words. You have been banned from commenting any further on this site. I am informing everyone that anyone else who chooses to comment in this tone will be permanently banned without warning. Reply where’s singhalese? Reply I don’t know where Singhalese is. And quite frankly I’m sick of hosting these sorts of questions. You’re not the first to ask, but you will be the last. Is this a comprehensive language tree? No it is not, you should know that before posting. It is a nice cartoon illustration that comes from Gamkrelidze and Ivanov’s, “The Early History of Indo-European Languages” which was printed in Scientific American in March 1990. If you have any questions why X language isn’t included in the tree, people should try and contact the people who made the tree. Reply Sinhalese is the language of Sri Lanka…. if you dont know where that is…. it is the little country just south of india Reply Erin. I’m pretty sure Singhalese is a branch of Indic. The tree doesn’t group the Indic languages into subfamilies so you’ll have to follow that up yourself. Reply this tree is has been made by a jerk of linguistic. where is the Albanian, one of the oldest language of Europe? Reply Getoverit. Reply This tree is totally wrong.I didnt see the Illyrian language, which is one of the oldest IE languages. Reply what bout the Albanian language??? Reply What about it? Reply i mean where is it on the tree??? Reply This diagram fails to address the tree as a whole in my opinion from known depository sources that have not been thoroughly examined yet, for example: None of my immediate family speaks German what so ever, and that I’ve never taken language courses in German what so ever, But that when I attempt to read German I can see the singularities… such as in words slightly misspelled or in different pronunciation, (but same meaning) Also pitch in conversation (or topic at hand ) helps me to better understand what is being conveyed, LOL yea I can pick that out , anyways I’m not here to bash the artist but I was really looking for a language tree that dates around the Sumerian times to present: (4000bc to present), However I’de Like to express that I am very opened minded about this topic so please reply with thoughts or facts. :) <— ( :), LOL )internet language). Reply BTW, has anyone done any type of research on native north and south American languages??? Reply there arent native north americans, they are dead. In LA you have several studies and language trees regarding native people. Just google it. Brazilian itself is for this reason a completely different language than Portuguese on many terms, from grammar to phonetic from verbs to several words. Language scientists” dont like that differentiation. Neither the european cause they are afraid ppl say there have no linkages to their (ex) pure exploitation colonies. Reply where is Albanian here Reply albanian is not proto indo language your language descends from asia Reply Everyone should know that language trees are all somewhat hypothetical. This does not make them uninteresting, though. It is rather sad how so many languages are dying around the world. By the way Kambiz, thanks for trying to keep the comments in line (tough job on the internet). Reply Pashto – Budapest – Estonian? Any lingual linkage? Reply Pingback: Die Indo-europäischen Sprachfamilien The picture shows this is just a branch of the tree, what I would like to see is the rest of the tree stemming from the ‘mother language’. D Reply Where is the Albanian? It should be near the root… Reply Nonsense. The three itself and the branches area do not represent anything. It is lacking some languages and shows other really dead ones. German speakers are aprx. 110 million and portuguese 300 million, it’s not even there. If english and german are so germanic why do you use feckin latin alphabet? How come english is so heavy on french words. I think you are a bit too nazi. Reply This tree is not complete. There are languages like for exemple Portuguese, Occitain or Catalan that should be in the Latin branch and they are not. Is that a reason to avoid them? Reply Where is Yiddish? It is one of the few languages to have a winner of the Nobel Prize write in the language. I look forward to a reply. Thank you. Reply Leave a Reply to TerryT Cancel reply Enter your comment here... Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment: Email (required) (Address never made public) Name (required) Website You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. ( Log Out / Change ) You are commenting using your Google account. ( Log Out / Change ) You are commenting using your Twitter account. ( Log Out / Change ) You are commenting using your Facebook account. ( Log Out / Change ) Cancel Connecting to %s Notify me of new comments via email. Notify me of new posts via email.