Kostenki 14 – A 36,000 Year Old European

Just what makes a European?

European genetic ancestry used to seem straightforward and in general is now understood as an admixture of three sources; indigenous European hunter-gatherers from 42,00 to 45,000 ago, Middle Easterners from the agricultural revolution 10,000 years ago, and Central Asians who charged through Europe in the last 4,000 to 5,000 years. Last month, a paper in Nature, suggested at each entity entered Europe by way of a separate migrations and only coalesced in the last 5,000 years. A new study published in yesterday’s Science changes this suggestion.

The 1954 photo provided by the Centre for GeoGenetics of the Natural History Museum of Denmark shows M .M. Gerasimov (on the right) with A.N. Rogachev (head of expedition on the left) excavating the fossil of Kostenki XIV in Kostenki-Borshchevo in what is now western Russia.  (AP Photo/Peter the Great Museum of Anthropology and Ethnography) MANDATORY CREDIT
The 1954 photo provided by the Centre for GeoGenetics of the Natural History Museum of Denmark shows M .M. Gerasimov (on the right) with A.N. Rogachev (head of expedition on the left) excavating the fossil of Kostenki XIV in Kostenki-Borshchevo in what is now western Russia. (AP Photo/Peter the Great Museum of Anthropology and Ethnography) MANDATORY CREDIT

This new study is based on ancient DNA extracted from the fossilized skeleton, Kostenki 14 or  K-14, who once was a short, dark featured man from approx. 36,000 years ago who died along the Middle Don River in Kostenki-Borshchevo, Russia. The team extracted 13 samples from the arm bone. The DNA was sequenced to a final coverage of 2.42x. That is relatively low and means on average each nucleotide site was read 2.4 times. Thus, the sequence is likely to include a large number of errors and gaps… This does make it the second oldest whole human genome sequenced, here was the first.

From the sequence data, aside from dark features, he also had about 1% more Neandertal DNA than do Europeans and Asians today. This confirms what another, even older human from Siberia had shown — that humans and Neandertals mixed early, before 45,000 years ago, perhaps in the Middle East. Analysis of his DNA shows he has genes from all three of those migratory groups and so was already “pure European,” by modern standards says evolutionary biologist Eske Willerslev of the Natural History Museum of Denmark at the University of Copenhagen, who led the analysis. K-14 shared genetic ancestry with hunter-gatherers in Europe—as well as with the early farmers, suggesting that his ancestors interbred with members of the same Middle Eastern population who later turned into farmers and came to Europe themselves. Finally, he also carried the signature of the shadowy western Asians, including a boy who lived 24,000 years ago at Mal’ta in central Siberia. If that finding holds up, the mysterious DNA from western Eurasia must be very ancient, and not solely from a wave of nomads that entered Europe 5,000 years ago or so, as proposed by researchers in September.

Eske Willerslev found that a man from Kostenki in modern-day Russia had a lot in common with living Europeans. (PETER THE GREAT MUSEUM OF ANTHROPOLOGY AND ETHNOGRAPHY MAN)
Eske Willerslev found that a man from Kostenki in modern-day Russia had a lot in common with living Europeans. (PETER THE GREAT MUSEUM OF ANTHROPOLOGY AND ETHNOGRAPHY MAN)

His study suggests that Europeans today are the descendants of a very old, interconnected population of hunter-gatherers that had already spread throughout Europe and much of central and western Asia by 36,000 years ago. Willerslev predicts that after modern humans spread out of Africa about 60,000 years ago, they met Neandertals and interbred with them, perhaps in the Middle East. Then while one branch headed east toward Melanesia and Australia, another branch of this founder population, a.k.a, “basal Eurasians” and spread north and west into Europe and central Asia.

K-14 shares very few of the genetic hallmarks and variants associated with East Asian & Native American populations, and suggests that East Asians and Eurasians diverged early and may even have engaged in separate migrations of Africa or the Middle East. I know last year there was the analysis of MA-1, found in the Altai region of Siberia which showed Native American genetic affinities and might suggest there was a large overlap between Eurasians and East Asia but MA-1 could be a rare exception Taken together, the Nature paper from last month and yesterday’s Science paper suggests a time frame of about 9,000 years in which the two genetic populations, Europeans & Eastern Asians, diverged and that Europeans are descent is very old and very complicated.

3 thoughts on “Kostenki 14 – A 36,000 Year Old European

  1. I can’t swallow the chronological estimates and I do not think they follow the data in the study in any unmistakable way. What this data confirms is that there is a common root for the West Eurasian (aka “Caucasoid”) continental population and that this root is from the initial Upper Paleolithic (before Kostenki).

    Within this continental population however Kostenki 4 and Mal’ta 1 represent a less important northern branch (with a very loose link among them both anyhow), while the Western Epipaleolithic (WHG) and the Early European Neolithic (EEF) populations make another branch altogether. This may be caused by root admixture at the EEF genesis in Thessaly and/or by a shared distinct origin in West Asia after the detachment of the Northern migrant groups. Only further aDNA research in West Asia and among older Western European specimens can clarify this probably.

    If we are talking of a c. 50 Ka BP formation of this West Eurasian branch, then there is definitely more time accumulated in the Asian parent branch than just since 60 Ka BP. Anyhow modern archaeology does NOT support such a belated OoA migration in any way and rather strongly suggests a 100 Ka old arrival to South and East Asia (c. 125 Ka for Arabia-Palestine, all within the Abassia Pluvial “pump” effect).

    1. You misunderstand.

      There are no CAUCASOIDS prior to 7000-10,000 years ago.
      There are no MONGOLOIDS prior to 20,000 years ago.

      There for a homo sapiens found at 36,000 years ago – prior to racial differentiation means that he is AFRICOID – i.e BLACK !!

      The first Europeans are BLACK.

      K-14, who once was a short, dark featured man from approx. 36,000 years ago who died along the Middle Don River in Kostenki-Borshchevo, Russia.

      1. I can’t say re. skin color but that’s the common foundational root of the modern West Eurasian population. Personally I think that there’s no reason for them to have been “black” once they began going northwards (although it’s possible they were “brown” or “olive” or whatever) but that’s the least important of the details. Australian Aborigines or many Indians are “black” in skin color and yet they are genetically closer (or even much closer in the case of Indians) to Europeans than to mainstream Africans, so pigmentation is not what I meant above just ancestry.

        Black as in skin color is surely just the ancestral state of all humankind. Just that at some point it became convenient to lose that trait as adaption to long winters in which vitamin D could not be synthesized in sufficient amounts to satisfy the needs of children particularly. Whether this happened in the Paleolithic or in the Neolithic (because of less direct vitamin D input from fish) I can’t say for sure. It is a secondary and highly adaptative development in any case and not fundamental for the definition of the population on a historical basis.

Comments are closed.

A WordPress.com Website.

Up ↑

%d bloggers like this: